Do you live in the US? This would be part of circumstantial evidence in conjunction with a response of why the statement was removed. by itself there is nothin

Do you live in the US? This would be part of circumstantial evidence in conjunction with a response of why the statement was removed. by itself there is nothing to debunk, it is a fact, the statement existed before, now it is down. That clearly warrants an explanation. i feel like the word coincidence is abused like the way the word conspiracy is abused, to shut down the conversation. The circumstances of these two events together absolutely are relevant to any lab leak investigation.