3 ms·
Is that different with Firefox? I haven't been paying attention in a while now but I constantly read complaints about UI changes - and Firefox has it's share of
by moonchrome 5y ago
Is that different with Firefox? I haven't been paying attention in a while now but I constantly read complaints about UI changes - and Firefox has it's share of experimental features that ended up being exploited or abuse (asm.js comes to mind).
- wizzwizz4 5y agoIt's not much different with Firefox, no. I was making a point that browser monopolies are bad; the fact we only have three real browser engines (two of which are based on Konqueror) is a problem. But at least Mozilla do a basic back-of-the-envelope “is this feature a huge security vulnerability” check before shipping. (Looking at you, <portal>.)
- blihp 5y agoOnly in the sense that when Google wants a new web standard the Firefox devs need to be convinced before it happens there. That has stopped a few, but not all, user hostile things from becoming defacto standards over the years.