4 ms·
I think these are trying to overload/damage the sensors on a satellite. Rather than damaging the body of the satellite. Makes sense, given that the sensors are
by rocqua 5y ago
I think these are trying to overload/damage the sensors on a satellite. Rather than damaging the body of the satellite. Makes sense, given that the sensors are made to be more sensitive.
- Diesel555 5y agoFor the first quote DIA stated > ...it may field higher power systems that extend the threat to the structures of non-optical satellites Just conjecture?
- rocqua 5y agoThe math here is doable. Approximately the inner angle of the cone of light comming from a laser beam is 1.22 2lamda/d (source: airy disk wikipedia). Where lamda is wavelength and d is the aperture. Lets pick lamda so 1.222lamda is 1000nm (blueish light). Then by smal angle approximation, the size of a beam at 500km (starlink height) is 500km * 1000nm / d Say we want our beam to be 50m wide. That gives an aperture requirement of 1cm. Huh, that seems reasonable. So in a vacuum, it could perhaps be done. Atmospheric effects would make this worse ofcourse. And a 50m beam is not going to dump much heat, but it seems somewhat plausible in the near future.