When you go down to regional variants of Wikipedia it gets even worse. In Latin America the editors that fully control political articles are hilariously aligne

When you go down to regional variants of Wikipedia it gets even worse. In Latin America the editors that fully control political articles are hilariously aligned with government entities. You'd get unsourced phrases like "the arrival of president X started a movement of improvement after the crisis caused by the economic policies of president Y", in practically every politically relevant article. The tonal shift with English Wikipedia is massive, but the editors are so many and versed in such obscure rulings that it's enormously difficult to get anything that goes against their propaganda to stick, even if it's demonstrably true stuff.