Np, this is gaslighting. "If you don't agree with our objectives, you are the enemy!" Disagreeing with specific elements of social justice, particularly state

Np, this is gaslighting. "If you don't agree with our objectives, you are the enemy!" Disagreeing with specific elements of social justice, particularly statements like: "The Wikimedia Foundation defines racial equity as shifting away from Eurocentricity, White-male-imperialist-patriarchal supremacy, superiority, power and privilege to create an environment that is inclusive and reflects the experiences of communities of color worldwide." Etc. is not 'being against social justice'. The distinction is quite important, in fact, it's kind of 'the point'. Most people agree with basic elements of social justice. How many people are opposed to women voting? To women having 'equal opportunity'? Etc. We're now into a war of opportunity and outcomes, which is a different kind of playing field. I think Wikepedia generally does a good job overall, and it's probably fairly hard to do, that said, there is bias.