3 ms·
I have tried making an effort for this in the past but it didn't work as there was no opposition but there wasn't much support as well. Also, I am not sure how
by actuator 5y ago
I have tried making an effort for this in the past but it didn't work as there was no opposition but there wasn't much support as well.
Also, I am not sure how we can verifiably prove that the editorial stance of one source is either day pro or against something, so it should be rated higher or lower, and if equal whose tone do we go with. As wiki editorialisation of news events is not preferred, you will have to go with existing editorialisation in media
- zozbot234 5y ago"Some support but no opposition" qualifies as consensus, at least provisionally. So you should be WP:BOLD and just edit the policy page directly. People might be upset and revert you, but you won't be in the wrong because you did after all seek consensus on talk, and they didn't object.
- davidgerard 5y agoeditors trying this on WP:RSP get reverted in short order
- zozbot234 5y agoEven after arguing for the change on the appropriate talk/noticeboard pages and getting qualified support and zero opposition? I'm not sure this has ever been tried properly, but I see no reason why it wouldn't work.