4 ms·
> Without specific examples this is pretty meaningless. I'd go one step further: specific examples are still meaningless. On a site with editors from every cou
by lucb1e 5y ago
> Without specific examples this is pretty meaningless.
I'd go one step further: specific examples are still meaningless. On a site with editors from every country and region on the world and millions of articles (not each one equally popular and viewed/vetted by other editors), of course you'll find examples for any point of view.
I'm also afraid it might then become a conversation about those specific examples. Proving systemic bias is unfortunately not trivial here. Without looking into examples at all, though, it's indeed a meaningless conversation that OP is creating.
- noxer 5y agoI think you overestimate who actually write and edits articles on Wikipedia. Its a very very very small group of people who does 80% and then an other small group who does 19% and then you have the millions of random people with internet who have contributed something.