I still send them money (even though they have plenty of money) because I feel that despite its human flaws, it's still a better objective representation of 'th

I still send them money (even though they have plenty of money) because I feel that despite its human flaws, it's still a better objective representation of 'the facts' than any other source on the planet. If, in fact, the editors are biased, but still represent a more objective viewpoint than those given to greater speculative possibilities, the public is still better served than if they are subjected to a cacophony of unsupported opinions.