These are normal problems in every society. A certain level of control and moderation is necessary to reach functionality and quality. But this means people gai

These are normal problems in every society. A certain level of control and moderation is necessary to reach functionality and quality. But this means people gain power, might misuse it, but also gain haters who just don't like the result independent of its quality. This is also nothing new. Complaints over Wikipedia's system and quality are existing since the beginning. This is normal because any system has their grind, their winners and losers. It doesn't mean the system is bad, or is producing bad results. Can you point out any real issues in their articles? Any widespreaded misinformation or actual issue? Most complaints I always see are usually about disputable details, not about actual problems.