Multiple people are liking your site, but I shall express a dissenting opinion (with details of specifically what I disliked): yes, it has character, but it was

Multiple people are liking your site, but I shall express a dissenting opinion (with details of specifically what I disliked): yes, it has character, but it was significantly overpowering and I didn’t like the presentation at all. (Its content I genuinely can’t comment on: I’ve been too severely distracted and disconcerted by the presentation.) A big unreadable title (the style of lettering makes it difficult to discern which strokes belong to which letter, and having it 500px tall against a distracting background makes it even harder to read, it’s just so big) with a fixed-attachment background (I honestly don’t know if I’ve ever found a case where I think that was actually warranted); then continual blocks of text in NewEddy, an uppercase-only display serif font that’s simply hard/uncomfortable to read. Body text in a monospace face, which is not good for reading in English (any time I come across blog posts that I actually want to read but where the site is using monospace body text, I nuke that style and breathe a sigh of relief). Then the marquee with parallax at the bottom somehow managed to be enter a class of disconcertion of its own, and that was before I discovered it was supposed to be a video (I have autoplay turned very firmly off, thank you very much), which improves some aspects and makes others worse. And finally I’ll mention the excessively low-contrast header that also collides with what’s underneath it at any given moment, and the footer footnote’s similarly badly low contrast.