It's a perspective that gets dismissed in western popular media, despite factual evidence: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Azov_Battalion https://en.wikipedia.or

It's a perspective that gets dismissed in western popular media, despite factual evidence: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Azov_Battalion https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Azov_Battalion https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2021/03/19/in-ukraine-stepan-bandera-s-legacy-becomes-a-political-football-again https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2021/03/19/in-ukraine-ste... https://www.ukrweekly.com/uwwp/local-governments-name-stadiums-after-bandera-and-shukhevych-provoking-protest-from-israel-and-poland/ https://www.ukrweekly.com/uwwp/local-governments-name-stadiu... https://www.cbsnews.com/news/us-votes-against-anti-nazi-resolution-at-united-nations/ https://www.cbsnews.com/news/us-votes-against-anti-nazi-reso... This obviously makes Ukraine look bad, because it IS bad. But given that this matter is heavily entangled in the reaons of the war, and current post-truth climate in the media, facts that don't fit black-white narrative simply get dismissed as Russian propaganda (which, truth be told, is one of the facts they actually base their propaganda on). Obviously real-world stuff is gray and muddy as it always is in such conflicts.