3 ms·
It's not necessarily a commitment to an impossible level of backwards compatibility, but rather a commitment to communicate any failure to attain that level cle
by Vinnl 5y ago
It's not necessarily a commitment to an impossible level of backwards compatibility, but rather a commitment to communicate any failure to attain that level clearly by bumping your major version number. I've found that to be pretty doable. (Which does usually come with a commitment to at least strive to attain that level, and to batch changes that do not live up to it.)
- paskozdilar 5y agoThat's a good point. Semver doesn't force you to do anything. You can stay on v0 forever for all it cares, or you can bump a major version every day. What semver doesn't allow you to do is lie to your users.