3 ms·

Yes, thank you. If you're sloppy with words you probably have other nasty habits. (apologies to Heinlein) There are reasons to employ regular languages with

• bawolff 5y ago
  I'd argue that if this is sloppy, then the use of "you" instead of "thou" is sloppy too. Using "you" for everything is confusing. How can i possibly know if you mean plural or singular? Sure some people might say "thou" is archaic, however so is using "regex" outside of academic contexts to mean regular languages. I don't see how one could justify one but not the other.
• efitz 5y ago
  Grammar sticklers usually fail on this point: human languages are not static, stuck in place from the time the stickler learned the rules. The current state of a human language is defined by common usage. The purpose of a language is for people to be able to communicate ideas. Ideas exist all up and down a specificity spectrum, e.g. “regex” might mean a specific syntax or one of several syntaxes depending on context. Kind of like “kleenex” might refer to a specific brand or to the general concept of tissue. If 99.9% of people successfully (by their own measure, not yours) communicate what they mean when they use the term “regular expression”, but you are among the 0.1% for which that interaction fails, then I would argue that the problem is your pedantry, not the term. I’m not saying this to be mean; I have similar issues.