> does this mean my understanding of "activate" setting PYTHONHOME (and thus being required for using a virtualenv) was true before this PEP was accepted? I be

> does this mean my understanding of "activate" setting PYTHONHOME (and thus being required for using a virtualenv) was true before this PEP was accepted? I believe that's what the activate scripts for third-party virtualenv tools did, yes. > Looks like python3.3? Yes, that's the version for which the PEP was accepted.