4 ms·
Or, if you don't like it, don't watch the channel or leave a dislike or comment why the claim is wrong. This isn't even a call to violence or targeted harassme
by selfhifive 5y ago
Or, if you don't like it, don't watch the channel or leave a dislike or comment why the claim is wrong.
This isn't even a call to violence or targeted harassment. It's the opinion of a man about election results.
- headsoup 5y agoI think you missed the bit where the platform removed content for the mere mention of Trump. So you agree YouTube is perfectly ok to remove content because it mentions 'the opinion of a man about election results.'? And if Trump was to hypothetically win in 2024, would it be perfectly fine for YouTube to remove any content which is dissenting of Trump? I'm sure a dislike or negative comment would stop that...
- scarface74 5y agoYes. There is nothing stopping Trump from creating his own video platform. He is supposedly a billionaire isn’t he?
- headsoup 5y agoAnd of course nothing from stopping Biden creating his own platform should the tables turn, right? It's true the large social platforms are privately owned and so they can censor to their hearts content, but given the obliquity and integration these largest platforms have in the social fabric, is that reasonable? Should they at least have clear moderation policies? It's an issue that needs some hefty discussion and evaluation especially, as we're seeing in this thread, the outsized influence on and control of public discourse they have.
- scarface74 5y agoYep, Biden and the DNC could fund their own site.
- MrLeap 5y agoThis comment is extra funny in light of youtube removing downvotes.