3 ms·
> Because that institution then worked another four times without incident. The institution, as flawed as it is, still kept transferring power peacefully. The
by splintercell 5y ago
> Because that institution then worked another four times without incident. The institution, as flawed as it is, still kept transferring power peacefully.
The question you aren't answering is: At what point do YOU draw the line. Stop trying to explain that the line wasn't crossed in 2020 election (or in any other election before that).
When, according to you, is the line crossed and the system has shown itself to be faulty.
My claim is that your answer will be either a deflection or implication that the system can never be faulty (anything but a clear answer).
- lostcolony 5y agoWhat line are you referring to? -I- said that the system "worked" in the sense that power was transferred peacefully. I didn't say the system was flawless; just the opposite. But to tear down and discredit the system, as Trump has been endeavoring to do, without providing a replacement (other than "Trump is president no matter what the vote says", if that needs clarifying), means that power will no longer be able to transfer peacefully. That's the -one and only feature- that the system HAS to have; and it's that one that we'd be dispensing with. I have no idea what any other lines being crossed has to do with anything.