5 ms·
That still has room for interpretation though. What if the car "works" under all conditions, but moves extremely slowly, takes huge detours to avoid tricky roa
by progbits 5y ago
That still has room for interpretation though.
What if the car "works" under all conditions, but moves extremely slowly, takes huge detours to avoid tricky roads etc. In fact what is stopping this "technically correct" approach: car calls a human driven tow truck, gets hitched and towed to destination?
- criddell 5y ago> what is stopping this "technically correct" approach Decency and reasonableness. Neither John nor Jeff are going to try to lawyer they way out of losing.
- progbits 5y agoOf course. I meant this in response to dharamon above talking about manufacturer's misleading claims. But I see their edit and I think I also misunderstood your point - in the context of this bet the selected criteria are probably good enough.
- ______-_-______ 5y agoI don't think it's that insanely ambiguous. If the car moves extremely slowly in a major city, it would get banned after a handful of traffic jams, and so wouldn't be commercially available. And anyways no company would risk the bad PR of launching a car that tops out at below the speed limit. If the car calls itself a tow truck, it has obviously failed to drive itself. If the car is programmed to avoid tricky roads, it can't "drive everywhere in all conditions" per SAE.
- Cd00d 5y agoGreat user name!
- ryandrake 5y agoExactly. "All conditions" means all conditions. Once a self-driving 4WD truck can be relied upon to get me over Echo Summit pass on US-50 during chain control / whiteout blizzard conditions, then maybe, just MAYBE I'll start to take it seriously. "Full" self driving, at least as of 2022, relies too heavily on all cows being spherical.
- ghaff 5y agoI don't really care for the L5 definition. Humans can't drive on all roads in all conditions even if their vehicles are theoretically capable of it. There are certainly weather conditions I don't want to be driving in. And there are certainly some unpaved roads I don't want to be driving on even with high clearance 4WD.
- jsmith45 5y agoThe realistic definition would be that if a human could not reasonably be expected to drive in it (fog/smog with less than 6 inches visibility, hurricane, blizzard, military invasion) then the cars are not required to drive it in. And perhaps the cars can accept a circumstance or two where humans can't drive, in exchange for one or two where humans could, but the cars can't. But it would need to be circumstances that humans can predict/understand. Like if the car won't drive if the countrywide car-to-car comms network is down or something.