3 ms·
The sites offer the articles for free to search engines and the like, otherwise this wouldn't work. It's not that different from using archive.is etc Imo. Hack
by GekkePrutser 5y ago
The sites offer the articles for free to search engines and the like, otherwise this wouldn't work.
It's not that different from using archive.is etc Imo. Hacker news isn't usable without this anymore.
- muttled 5y agoYou bring up an interesting point that they offer it for free to search engines. Didn't it used to be against the rules of most search engines to "cloak" your content by serving one thing to the spiders and another to the general public? Edit: Found it. It's still against their rules. <https://developers.google.com/search/docs/advanced/guidelines/cloaking#:~:text=Cloaking%20refers%20to%20the%20practice,different%20results%20than%20they%20expected. https://developers.google.com/search/docs/advanced/guideline...>
- stall 5y agoWell, google published https://developers.google.com/search/docs/advanced/structured-data/paywalled-content https://developers.google.com/search/docs/advanced/structure... which describes how it should be done