4 ms·
>If another nation did anything even remotely comparable, those involved would undoubtedly find themselves at The Hague. ICC actions are almost exclusively lim
by whatshisface 5y ago
>If another nation did anything even remotely comparable, those involved would undoubtedly find themselves at The Hague.
ICC actions are almost exclusively limited to things that happen in Africa, although their ongoing investigations appear to include some middle eastern countries.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_people_indicted_in_the_International_Criminal_Court https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_people_indicted_in_the...
https://www.coalitionfortheicc.org/explore/icc-situations-and-cases https://www.coalitionfortheicc.org/explore/icc-situations-an...
- rjzzleep 5y agoThat's a weird way to phrase it. There have been quite a few cases of people suing the USA at the ICC and winning. It's more the fact that the USA doesn't give a rats ass about decisions at the ICC. But I'm under no illusion to think that China would give a f* if someone sued them there. It's hard to talk about international justice when USA refuses people to be tried at the ICC(like Saddam Hussein) and has a law to invade the Netherlands should an American service member be indicted[1]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Service-Members%27_Protection_Act https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Service-Members%27_Pr...