It's more of a "no true unicorn" than a "no true Scotsman." I cannot think of a single act of international aggression that was truly justified, in the high-min

It's more of a "no true unicorn" than a "no true Scotsman." I cannot think of a single act of international aggression that was truly justified, in the high-minded sense of "international law," only ones which had assent from the allies of the aggressor as well as non-allied states they were able to pressure into going along with it.