3 ms·
> I understand that you as proud Indian and Western hater, will do anything to support Russia in this War. Which part of the comment supported Russia? > At le
by unmole 5y ago
> I understand that you as proud Indian and Western hater, will do anything to support Russia in this War.
Which part of the comment supported Russia?
> At least while that's the official position from India.
Here is India's official position as stated in the Explanation of Vote: https://twitter.com/ambtstirumurti/status/1499073038154874881/photo/2 https://twitter.com/ambtstirumurti/status/149907303815487488...
Which part of that supports Russia?
> So his goal was clearly one: Ukrainian independence.
That is actually a position Indians can fully understand and appreciate. And right now Indians care about getting their citizens stranded in Ukraine back home, ensuring that shipments of potash from Russia are not disrupted and not antagonizing their largest weapons supplier.
> Why I think that it is just Russian Propaganda? Because to bring those "factoids" now is just to justify the invasion of the Ukraine. There is no other intention other than be used in the Information Warfare.
Again, TFA is about changing the rules of censorship. FB previously considered any support of the Azov Battalion unacceptable because of the neo-Nazi connection. Was FB also a part of Russian propaganda?
- pelasaco 5y ago> Was FB also a part of Russian propaganda? In fact it was an instrument, yes: https://www.npr.org/2022/02/28/1083633239/facebook-and-tiktok-block-russian-state-media-in-europe https://www.npr.org/2022/02/28/1083633239/facebook-and-tikto...
- unmole 5y agoFor the third time, TFA is about Facebook modifying it's policy to allow praise of an organisation it previously blocked for having neo-Nazi associations. Rather than address that in anyway, your response has been to claim it's all Russian propaganda and now to link to a completely irrelevant article about Facebook blocking Russian state media.
- pelasaco 5y agoYou finished your last answer with a question. The question was answered. TFA don't define in which directions the discussions go. We, commenters, do. Feel free to just ignore further comments.
- unmole 5y ago> You finished your last answer with a question. The question was answered. You misunderstood the question. Let me restate it more clearly: Was Facebook's original decision to censor praise of the Azov Batallion due it's neo-Nazi associations also Russian propaganda?
- pelasaco 5y ago> Here is India's official position as stated in the Explanation of Vote: ... India abstained, which is support to Russia. Looks like the world agree with me: https://foreignpolicy.com/2022/03/03/india-ukraine-russia-war-putin-weapons-un/ https://foreignpolicy.com/2022/03/03/india-ukraine-russia-wa... https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-60552273 https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-60552273 The list go on and on. Other brics leaders, avoided criticism, but voted against Russia, in the UN general assembly. Abstention meant, business first, Ukraine second.