3 ms·
> They did all the cleaning, all the cooking, all the entertaining, and all the decorating and did really well. If you’re cleaning foeces off the side of someo
by nailer 5y ago
> They did all the cleaning, all the cooking,
all the entertaining, and all the decorating and did really well.
If you’re cleaning foeces off the side of someone else’s room toilet you’re working class. I’m not sure why the author thinks it’s obvious that “her grandparents owned a hotel” means she’s not, like the quote above doesn’t count for anything.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- achenet 5y agoHistorically, those who owned property were the haves, and those who worked it were the have-nots. Médiéval lord/peasant, Cotton plantation owner/African slaves, Captialist/worker, etc. As such, owning a hotel, which is a business that can provide you with revenue without you working (obviously in this case the grandparents did choose to work, but could have chosen to have other do the work for them and still reap the profits), generally makes you upper class. For another argument- If you own a hotel, you have a net worth greater than at least 80% of the population, and hence are upper middle/upper class. A hobo on the street corner might work less, but has net worth 0, hence is lower class, which is often used as a synomym for working class
- nailer 5y ago> obviously in this case the grandparents did choose to work, but could have chosen to have other do the work for them and still reap the profits Why is that obvious? It seems to me the profits weren’t great as indicated by the grandparents cleaning.