3 ms·
Why is it more absurd? Is it because the equation then means: (n=O || n=1) || n>=2? Meaning the deduction leads to "strictly zero or once" OR "many more than 1"
by czbond 5y ago
Why is it more absurd? Is it because the equation then means: (n=O || n=1) || n>=2?
Meaning the deduction leads to "strictly zero or once" OR "many more than 1"
Once seems less logical from a metaphysical perspective to me than multiple.
- SideburnsOfDoom 5y ago> Why is it more absurd? Get back to me when you have literally done it. Animal or plant, flesh is subject to entropy. > Is it because the equation then means: (O || 1) || infinity? Are you high or mentally ill?
- czbond 5y ago> Are you high or mentally ill? Neither - just think differently ;) The visceral reaction leads me to believe you might understand the possibility, but may reject it mentally, of any number of birth over "0" leads to a higher probability of "many" than "1".
- SideburnsOfDoom 5y agoor that I don't think that what you said makes any sense at all. Not even coherent enough to be wrong.