Thank you for answering. Well-presented 'truths', according to whose perspective? eg: "reducing roadside bombs is an objectively good goal" Well, from one pe

Thank you for answering. Well-presented 'truths', according to whose perspective? eg: "reducing roadside bombs is an objectively good goal" Well, from one perspective - who wants more roadside bombs?! But if the road side bombs are being put in place by the natives of a country to make things harder for what the natives perceive to be an invading force, to help prevent the occupation and destruction their country, perhaps this is a valid act? Perhaps you would think defending your country against an invader is valid. So, from that perspective, what is the problem with a road side bomb when you are fighting an invading force that can call in airstrikes. Taking action against a far more powerful force in defence of your country is heroic. The problem with all 'presentations of the truth' is that its not a presentation of truth at all. There is no unbiased perspective. But if you are able to broadcast your message via a megaphone (via the media) loudest you probably 'win' - by lying to everyone. So, who has 'the truth'? Does the government that pays your paycheck? You are simply creating and broadcasting the message you have been told to - it is your job - you do what you are told for money. Right or wrong and truth have nothing to do with it. You may think you are doing 'right' but all your are doing is accepting the comforting provided illusions that your paymasters are providing you with to enable you to do that job. They say it is 'right' because it suits their agenda, and you accept that because it suits yours (money and not feeling bad about what you do). You are not expressing truth, nor is what you are doing aligned with your personal morality, if you even have a personal morality.