> If you agree it is a result of the Russian invasion, you can't say it's not a result of Russian airstrikes. Airstrike has a specific meaning. From what I und

> If you agree it is a result of the Russian invasion, you can't say it's not a result of Russian airstrikes. Airstrike has a specific meaning. From what I understand Russian attack on the airport was primarily an assault by airborne infantry. It's entirely possible that the Antonov was destroyed by a Russian munition. It still doesn't mean it was a result of a Russian airstrike.