The real kicker in OSI’s judgement of Unlicense is that it seems that the only reason they approved it is because it was written so badly that it failed in its

The real kicker in OSI’s judgement of Unlicense is that it seems that the only reason they approved it is because it was written so badly that it failed in its goal of being a public domain dedication, and will probably be interpreted as a license instead. (That’s how I read their wording, which is very slightly ambiguous, but seems to be talking about the document as a whole rather than just the intended fallback license aspects.)