6 ms·

>>Nobody knows if it's even possible to get Microsoft Game Pass running on it What do you mean nobody knows? Just install windows on it, and play your Gamepass

>>Nobody knows if it's even possible to get Microsoft Game Pass running on it What do you mean nobody knows? Just install windows on it, and play your Gamepass games? Same with the Epic launcher. >>It's as if someone posted "Here's how you get Netflix for free", and Netflix filed a DMCA request against it. That's not even remotely comparable. May I remind you that in US Sony has lost the legal battle against Blem! Emulator, for this exact reason, and the court was explicit in its ruling - the games that you own can be played on other systems using emulators and Sony doesn't get to have a say in it. >>You just don't have a right to enjoy theirs without paying the entry fee. No one said anything about playing games without paying for them. That's your own interpretation. >>Compare this to a Nintendo switch, it's a small game console for me to play Smash Bros and Advance Wars. It's a vastly more polished experience. Literally no one is making you get rid of your switch. Enjoy the system and the experiences on it.

999900000999 5y ago
There's no way to legally dump a switch rom. It's just what it is, you'd have to crack the DRM on it and that's already a violation of the DMCA. Let's be honest for a second, almost no one who's running a switch emulator legally purchase those games, and then dumped those games to a file. Sure, it's possible but that's not what 99.9% of users are going to do. You attempt to install Windows on a Steam Deck, but it looks like nothing works yet. https://www.tomshardware.com/how-to/install-windows-steam-deck https://www.tomshardware.com/how-to/install-windows-steam-de...
- gambiting 5y ago
  >>It's just what it is, you'd have to crack the DRM on it and that's already a violation of the DMCA. I don't live on the US and there's literally nothing illegal about dumping a switch ROM here. DMCA doesn't have any authority here. Besides, even in US you have the right to make a copy of the media you own and this particular scenario hasn't been tested in court so at best you are speculating. >>Let's be honest for a second, almost no one who's running a switch emulator legally purchase those games, and then dumped those games to a file. Where I live you can legally just download a copy of a game that you own and play that, nothing illegal about that. >>Sure, it's possible but that's not what 99.9% of users are going to do. Even then, that's not a reason for Nintendo to remove those videos from YouTube. Just like a video explaining how to use a torrent client shouldn't be removed, even though "probably" 99.9% of users use torrents to pirate content. Did you forget the entire discussion last year about the takedown of Youtube-DL? Just because something might be used illegally doesn't make it illegal. >>You attempt to install Windows on a Steam Deck, but it looks like nothing works yet Right, that part I'll admit I wasn't aware of.
  - 999900000999 5y ago
    YouTube is an American based company, therefore they should not encourage the violation of American laws. Additionally, YouTube has a right to act in their own best interest. Nintendo also runs advertising on various Google products, if responding to their DCMA request makes it easier for Google to turn a profit, why not?
  - 0xcde4c3db 5y ago
    > Besides, even in US you have the right to make a copy of the media you own Not in the sense that we usually refer to "rights" in US law. The big tangle here is that Congress essentially passed one law that said making copies is only legal under one set of conditions, then passed a different law saying that breaking DRM is only legal under a different set of conditions.

999900000999 5y ago

There's no way to legally dump a switch rom. It's just what it is, you'd have to crack the DRM on it and that's already a violation of the DMCA. Let's be honest for a second, almost no one who's running a switch emulator legally purchase those games, and then dumped those games to a file. Sure, it's possible but that's not what 99.9% of users are going to do. You attempt to install Windows on a Steam Deck, but it looks like nothing works yet. https://www.tomshardware.com/how-to/install-windows-steam-deck https://www.tomshardware.com/how-to/install-windows-steam-de...

gambiting 5y ago
>>It's just what it is, you'd have to crack the DRM on it and that's already a violation of the DMCA. I don't live on the US and there's literally nothing illegal about dumping a switch ROM here. DMCA doesn't have any authority here. Besides, even in US you have the right to make a copy of the media you own and this particular scenario hasn't been tested in court so at best you are speculating. >>Let's be honest for a second, almost no one who's running a switch emulator legally purchase those games, and then dumped those games to a file. Where I live you can legally just download a copy of a game that you own and play that, nothing illegal about that. >>Sure, it's possible but that's not what 99.9% of users are going to do. Even then, that's not a reason for Nintendo to remove those videos from YouTube. Just like a video explaining how to use a torrent client shouldn't be removed, even though "probably" 99.9% of users use torrents to pirate content. Did you forget the entire discussion last year about the takedown of Youtube-DL? Just because something might be used illegally doesn't make it illegal. >>You attempt to install Windows on a Steam Deck, but it looks like nothing works yet Right, that part I'll admit I wasn't aware of.
- 999900000999 5y ago
  YouTube is an American based company, therefore they should not encourage the violation of American laws. Additionally, YouTube has a right to act in their own best interest. Nintendo also runs advertising on various Google products, if responding to their DCMA request makes it easier for Google to turn a profit, why not?
- 0xcde4c3db 5y ago
  > Besides, even in US you have the right to make a copy of the media you own Not in the sense that we usually refer to "rights" in US law. The big tangle here is that Congress essentially passed one law that said making copies is only legal under one set of conditions, then passed a different law saying that breaking DRM is only legal under a different set of conditions.