4 ms·
it does, but it is not as significant in normal weather conditions in the frequency ranges we're dealing with here (Likely sub 2.4 Ghz) [1], (General rule of th
by Anunayj 5y ago
it does, but it is not as significant in normal weather conditions in the frequency ranges we're dealing with here (Likely sub 2.4 Ghz) [1], (General rule of thumb, Atmosphere absorbs everything except visible spectrum and 10 cm - 10 m wavelength), compare this to effect from the inverse square law. :)
Now this might be significant enough in directional waves with a huge constant multiplier (like a 'ideal' laser with no divergence). Someone can probably give insight on it here.
1. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/270512069_Propagation_Power_Loss_Analysis_and_Evaluation_under_Variant_Atmospheric_Conditions https://www.researchgate.net/publication/270512069_Propagati...
- genewitch 5y agoI'm curious why you ordered the wavelengths the way you did, you totally potholed my entire comprehension. 10 meters (28mhz) through 10cm (2800mhz) to me reads "left to right".
- Anunayj 5y agoOh I just wrote it like that cause that's what I remembered off the top of my head. For some reason my brain prefers using wavelengths for Radio waves (short wave radio, long wave radio) while frequencies when looking at the whole spectrum.