How can you conflate your direct electrode transcranial electrical stimulation paper with non-contact magnetic field rate of change induced electrical fields? T

How can you conflate your direct electrode transcranial electrical stimulation paper with non-contact magnetic field rate of change induced electrical fields? That's just unsupportable. You're not going to get anywhere near 1V/m across the brain tissues with even a kiloamp of low frequency (ie, <500 Hz) AC current non-contact. Rate of change matters for induced fields. Cool paper and impressive but the direct contact, part of the circuit, tES results don't translate to this context. The induced voltages (for the power cable) would be so far below the noise floor that not even arguments for stochastic resonance boosting above threshold make sense.