3 ms·
> Okay? That has nothing to do with my point. I disagree. The phrasing you used implied that you believed the United States did not already have a caste system
by robinsoh 5y ago
> Okay? That has nothing to do with my point.
I disagree. The phrasing you used implied that you believed the United States did not already have a caste system and that foreigners were bringing it to the US. This is factually incorrect since the US always had a very strict caste system pretty much from the inception of the nation only repealed recently, and even then still functionally present.
- icelancer 5y agoNo it didn't imply that, because I have no idea what you are talking about. I am merely commenting on the caste system literally described in the article written and linked here about India.
- robinsoh 5y agoThen what exactly is implied by " Not sure what you want done there. I freely believe that the caste system of the host country carries over to the United States, but attempting to subvert that via "good" racist methods is not going to fly, especially if documented. ". Not sure what you want done there? Aren't you implying that the US is a caste-free system with the there?