4 ms·
NATO(but mostly france, UK and the US) bombed Libya so many times that NATO ran out and Germany had to restock them[1]. Germany is always "kind of" neutral. Th
by rjzzleep 5y ago
NATO(but mostly france, UK and the US) bombed Libya so many times that NATO ran out and Germany had to restock them[1]. Germany is always "kind of" neutral.
The US dropped 27k missiles on 7 countries in 2016 alone.[2]
But that isn't really the point of my post. While Russia did in fact declare war on Ukraine and for whatever reasons or whatever your opinion on that is, the West has effectively declared global war on Russia and it will take a lot of restraint from Russia not respond in kind. And since they can't respond in the same way economically the only option would be actual real war.
This is what happens when you leave diplomacy to a bunch of lawyer bros from Oxford and Harvard who have never had to deal with someone saying no to them.
[1] https://www.reuters.com/article/us-germany-libya-idUSTRE75Q5N320110627 https://www.reuters.com/article/us-germany-libya-idUSTRE75Q5...
[2] https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/u-s-bombed-iraq-syria-pakistan-afghanistan-libya-yemen-somalia-n704636 https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/u-s-bombed-iraq-syria-pak...
- baq 5y agoor you could say that they've collected intelligence on Putin and his inner circle and decided that they can turn it around on him. which seems to be sort of working, but at great cost. we'll see in a couple of weeks when russia starts running out of basic stuff like toilet paper. either way Putin doesn't seem to be treated as a rational actor anymore. he might still think straight, but he seems to believe in his own propaganda.
- erosenbe0 5y agoGood point (edit: about diplomatic underperformance if not corruption) You dont want these Harvard law types negotiating since they have no motivation [on average] to develop that competence. USA has constructed a legal system that has oligarchial characteristics. In Germany the top law graduates do not automatically earn 3x salary of graduates of average schools who pass same exam with same concrete skills. So developing competence or refinement of professional skill is not strictly necessary for top American legal graduates as the system is designed and regulated such that their firms earn windfall fees and their entry-level salary is way above experienced lawyer averages. Whereas in German system (for example) the fee differential reflects more of a proper free market without such ridiculous features.
- rjzzleep 5y agoThere seems to be a pretty tight link between the CDU/CSU and the Uni Bayreuth lawschool though. There's also the fact that there are a lot of Law professors in Germany that are famous for taking advantage of girls during their studies, because if you don't get a good grade in the law system you're effectively out and because they have lifetime tenure they have nothing to fear. But I do agree that on the grand scheme of themes Germany is WAY better than the other countries, especially considering the fact that they actually have a lot more parties in their parliament and sometimes actually have diverse opinions on things.
- erosenbe0 5y agoThanks for insight on German system. In USA, as elsewhere, there is a market for legal services, which of course motivates skill and competence. But the construction of the system (by the elites) is such that there is maybe an upper 5% of services that generate ~10x more revenues -- things like corporate mergers, investment banking, certain torts, etc. This doesn't happen as much in other countries. And you don't get into the premium service club by working 20 years to be a master of the trade -- you get there by simply gaining admission to Harvard Law and passing the bar same as any other lawyer.