3 ms·

No, you won't, just like you wouldn't if you switched offices. Google is and always has been very clear about this. They pay market rates based on location.

deleted 5y ago
[deleted]
noasaservice 5y ago
Because where your computer, desk, and chair matters of the quality of work you do? No. These are shitty capitalist ploys trying to tell you the above is true when it's blatantly false. And well, they'd work you for no money, but they wouldn't have workers. If anything, I'd claim to live in a high CoL area while being in the Midwest. They get their quality work, I get my commensurate compensation. Fuck them for thinking otherwise.
- aikinai 5y ago
  It has nothing to do with cost of living; it’s market rates which are set by supply and demand. London is super expensive but the pay is much lower than even the rural American pay scale since UK engineers don’t get paid well anywhere and will work for Google even if they’re getting half of what they’d get in the US. They could move to the US—Google would support the transfer—but they don’t, so there remains a supply of people who are willing to work for that rate in London. As others mentioned, if Google ignored supply and demand and paid for quality of work only, why would they pay everyone the high rates that were originally set by supply and demand in Silicon Valley? They’d pay a normal living wage for someone in India.
  - humanrebar 5y ago
    They throw around "market rates" like there's a local market. Grouping employees into buckets by postal code makes sense for work-from-the-office arrangements. On the other hand, in theory the bottom markets will see their rates rise quickly (because they merged into one wider remote market) if remote is as popular as it apparently is.
- TomVDB 5y ago
  If companies had to settle on exactly 1 pay rate everywhere around the world, the last thing I’d be willing to bet on is that they choose the salary of their most expensive COL location.
- namdnay 5y ago
  You’re right. Let’s align everyone worldwide on the salary of Google Hyderabad
- lysium 5y ago
  You sound very angry. Your compensation is not absolute dollars but what you can get for those dollars. Ideally the same dollar would get you the same everywhere in the world. That is not the case atm. Instead, people at your new location will provide the same quality of work for fewer dollars, because they see what they can get for those dollars. That is your capitalist competition.
  - dottedmag 5y ago
    > Your compensation is not absolute dollars Well, actually it is.
makeramen 5y ago
You do keep your compensation if you don't move your address, otherwise you get paid a market rate adjustment for that area, which from what I've seen is quite fair.
dietr1ch 5y ago
Yeah, market rates, but those studies end up in bad offers outside tech-hubs as top 80% of the market is still targeting way less skilled people than the one they "want" to retain. It's almost seems like the policy is designed in this way so it sounds fair and at the same time keeps new locations from popping up

deleted 5y ago

[deleted]

noasaservice 5y ago

Because where your computer, desk, and chair matters of the quality of work you do? No. These are shitty capitalist ploys trying to tell you the above is true when it's blatantly false. And well, they'd work you for no money, but they wouldn't have workers. If anything, I'd claim to live in a high CoL area while being in the Midwest. They get their quality work, I get my commensurate compensation. Fuck them for thinking otherwise.

aikinai 5y ago
It has nothing to do with cost of living; it’s market rates which are set by supply and demand. London is super expensive but the pay is much lower than even the rural American pay scale since UK engineers don’t get paid well anywhere and will work for Google even if they’re getting half of what they’d get in the US. They could move to the US—Google would support the transfer—but they don’t, so there remains a supply of people who are willing to work for that rate in London. As others mentioned, if Google ignored supply and demand and paid for quality of work only, why would they pay everyone the high rates that were originally set by supply and demand in Silicon Valley? They’d pay a normal living wage for someone in India.
- humanrebar 5y ago
  They throw around "market rates" like there's a local market. Grouping employees into buckets by postal code makes sense for work-from-the-office arrangements. On the other hand, in theory the bottom markets will see their rates rise quickly (because they merged into one wider remote market) if remote is as popular as it apparently is.
TomVDB 5y ago
If companies had to settle on exactly 1 pay rate everywhere around the world, the last thing I’d be willing to bet on is that they choose the salary of their most expensive COL location.
namdnay 5y ago
You’re right. Let’s align everyone worldwide on the salary of Google Hyderabad
lysium 5y ago
You sound very angry. Your compensation is not absolute dollars but what you can get for those dollars. Ideally the same dollar would get you the same everywhere in the world. That is not the case atm. Instead, people at your new location will provide the same quality of work for fewer dollars, because they see what they can get for those dollars. That is your capitalist competition.
- dottedmag 5y ago
  > Your compensation is not absolute dollars Well, actually it is.

makeramen 5y ago

You do keep your compensation if you don't move your address, otherwise you get paid a market rate adjustment for that area, which from what I've seen is quite fair.

dietr1ch 5y ago

Yeah, market rates, but those studies end up in bad offers outside tech-hubs as top 80% of the market is still targeting way less skilled people than the one they "want" to retain. It's almost seems like the policy is designed in this way so it sounds fair and at the same time keeps new locations from popping up