2 ms·
The paper you've linked to (https://sci-hub.se/https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617709589 https://sci-hub.se/https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617709589) points out
by kranner 5y ago
The paper you've linked to (https://sci-hub.se/https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617709589 https://sci-hub.se/https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617709589) points out methodological flaws in meditation-related research, ambiguities in the meaning of "mindfulness" etc.; it doesn't set out to prove that meditation doesn't 'work' (in the sense that it causes no effects).
In fact the paper acknowledges instances of meditation-induced adverse effects; if meditation didn't do anything at all, why would anyone experience even adverse effects? Clearly meditation does have effects.
- JacobThreeThree 5y agoIf the definitions of the key terms and concepts in meditation is ambiguous, the body of scientific evidence of meditation doing anything is not particularly convincing.