4 ms·
In the article the figures of 18% vs 36% are mentioned rather than 15% vs 97%.
by doetoe 5y ago
In the article the figures of 18% vs 36% are mentioned rather than 15% vs 97%.
- abhink 5y agoRight, it is. Like I said, the figures I've pulled are from what I remember from 15 years back. Unfortunately I'm not able to find any sources with light searhcing. I'd like to point out that there is a high possibility that there is an upward trend in reservation category cutoffs. And if it is indeed the case then I'd be the happiest. As for my other claim, please see [1] and [2]. 1. https://www.theyouth.in/2018/06/16/candidate-who-scored-minus-9-in-math-0-in-gk-will-now-teach-math-at-school/ https://www.theyouth.in/2018/06/16/candidate-who-scored-minu... 2. https://www.india.com/education/zero-cut-off-maths-phd-interview-criteria-for-scst-applicants-at-delhi-university-2377722/ https://www.india.com/education/zero-cut-off-maths-phd-inter...