> Why not "mainly remote but be in the office when it makes sense to be in the office"? Depends on the space utilization. The company paying for real estate th

> Why not "mainly remote but be in the office when it makes sense to be in the office"? Depends on the space utilization. The company paying for real estate that "might" be used isn't very efficient. If they have a temporary work area system, it's different. Then they can down scale their real estate footprint and accommodate ad hoc visitors, by reservation, or the occasional "group meeting". But if they're dedicating space to someone who isn't there, it's a bit of a waste. My last company called this "hoteling".