4 ms·
This is what the article argues. That it is possible that they used up most of their precision guided bombs in Syria and are mostly left with unguided munition
by ratg13 5y ago
This is what the article argues. That it is possible that they used up most of their precision guided bombs in Syria and are mostly left with unguided munitions.
- mardifoufs 5y agoI'm not sure I'd agree because they haven't even used their ballistic or cruise missiles in any significant number either. And we know they have a lot, lot more of those even if we just count Soviet stock. To me that indicates that there is something more to it than just lacking the munition itself.
- JumpCrisscross 5y ago> they haven't even used their ballistic or cruise missiles in any significant number either Those need targeting. And the article mentions a lack of targeting pods. (UkrAF is largely functional because the initial volley missed many air fields, planes and radar systems.) This increasingly looks like the Russian military procured shiny, expensive kit from cronies and then neglected to equip them.