Vagrancy / NIMBY / property values ... that is not surprising at all. The interesting thing is such laws are of course preferentially/conditionally applied to

Vagrancy / NIMBY / property values ... that is not surprising at all. The interesting thing is such laws are of course preferentially/conditionally applied to you if you "look homeless". In this case they are being applied to owners, which implies a "sucky local politics" subcurrent. Why would the mayor not waive enforcement in this case? Smells like a shitty town government.