4 ms·
You know that isn't an argument against what I said, right? Like, at all. It completely supports what I said.
by bradlys 5y ago
You know that isn't an argument against what I said, right? Like, at all. It completely supports what I said.
- fallingknife 5y agoYou said: > If you make it so that only “merit” is considered - you’re only gonna get rich kids. He said: > The merit-based school such as Styuvesant in NYC and Lowell in SF are both filled with rather poor Asian kids. > The demographic profile of these two schools are substantially lower income than the very expensive cities they reside in. It couldn't possibly be further from supporting what you said.
- bradlys 5y agoSince people here are often ESL. I'll put it this way: "English is a rich language." Please try to think about how the context of what I said could be interpreted. If you take literally everything at face value - you're truly not thinking critically about anything.
- shard 5y agoNot sure why you keep arguing against yourself. Many immigrant Asian families have households which are not English-fluent.
- lelanthran 5y ago> You know that isn't an argument against what I said, right? Like, at all. It completely supports what I said. It's literally the opposite of what you said, unless you suddenly changed your mind and agree that the merit-based schools are the best option for poor kids.