3 ms·
I think it's exciting to see frameworks like https://remix.run/ https://remix.run/ trying to temper the disadvantages of SPAs by relying on web standards and se
by uhoh-itsmaciek 5y ago
I think it's exciting to see frameworks like https://remix.run/ https://remix.run/ trying to temper the disadvantages of SPAs by relying on web standards and server-side rendering. It's pretty cool that this is a JavaScript framework that can work without any (client-side) JavaScript.
- freedomben 5y agoHonest question: why is remix the primary example for this now? Next.js has been doing this for years and is really amazing. It seems like a ton of people had no idea this was even a problem they had until remix came along, and now remix is the savior. Am I missing something with remix? Is there anything really novel that it does/introduces?
- uhoh-itsmaciek 5y agoI don't know. I'm not very familiar with Next.js (I'd heard about it but never really looked into it much). Your response inspired me to investigate, and I found an article by a Remix founder about the differences [1]. It's obviously biased, but maybe still interesting. It looks like there was an HN submission and a bit of discussion, too. There's a bunch of other comparisons out there, too. [1]: https://remix.run/blog/remix-vs-next https://remix.run/blog/remix-vs-next [2]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29983950 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29983950
- pl0x 5y ago