3 ms·
NATO forces weren't involved with the Iraq war. The Afghanistan missions were conducted due to UN resolutions.
by bhaak 5y ago
NATO forces weren't involved with the Iraq war.
The Afghanistan missions were conducted due to UN resolutions.
- croes 5y agoSo the US has different soldiers and equipment for NATO, or is it just legal construct. How can you distinguish a coalition army of Brits, Italians and Americans from a NATO army of Brits, Italians and Americans? It's the patch, isn't it? The rest is the same.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- pastacacioepepe 5y agoNATO and UN are basically twin brothers from the geopolitical stance. We can say the "West" instead of NATO if that's better for you.
- mbg721 5y agoThe UN puts Russia and China in veto positions; that's a significant difference from NATO.
- pastacacioepepe 5y agoYet it's clear that Russia is isolated in the UN (with slight support from China). As of now, NATO and UN are both playing the same game.
- croes 5y agoAnd it was about NATO forces not led by NATO. The forces of a NATO member are NATO forces. Or do you think if Russia would attack polish forces it wouldn't be considered as an attack on NATO forces?