> They don’t like the way unions leveraged a pandemic to put their members’ interests ahead of the children’s. This seems like a cheap shot. I assume the artic

> They don’t like the way unions leveraged a pandemic to put their members’ interests ahead of the children’s. This seems like a cheap shot. I assume the article is mentioning teacher’s unions, which should logically prioritize the teacher’s interests over children’s. Don’t they exist to advocate for teachers and not students by definition?