2 ms·
Yup trustless naming would be even better, gave the example of ENS because it's popular. My point is that we need adoption for decentralized naming, routing/lo
by can16358p 5y ago
Yup trustless naming would be even better, gave the example of ENS because it's popular.
My point is that we need adoption for decentralized naming, routing/locating, hosting/"pinning". Be it a combination of ENS/Handshake/IPFS/Sia/Filecoin/BitTorrent/Ethereum or any combination of stacks.