3 ms·
Nah… if so was embracing C# style complexity I would rather do Swift of Rust. At least they have a clean solution for fixing the million-dollar-mistake. My chi
by socialdemocrat 5y ago
Nah… if so was embracing C# style complexity I would rather do Swift of Rust. At least they have a clean solution for fixing the million-dollar-mistake.
My chief attraction to Go is simplicity. I can be away from Go for years and pick it up again really fast. With simplicity, you naturally need to make some sacrifices, but I think Go team has been diligent about choosing those.
- kerkeslager 5y ago> Nah… if so was embracing C# style complexity I would rather do Swift of Rust. Just so we're clear here, you're using the word "complexity" to describe the situation of not having to copy paste or `go generate` 30 different implementations of the same class for different types because your language lacks generics.