3 ms·
I'm not versed in secretarial terms-of-art, but given the unusual grammatical construction, I believe the "to" you left out of that list is actually doing the h
by Talanes 5y ago
I'm not versed in secretarial terms-of-art, but given the unusual grammatical construction, I believe the "to" you left out of that list is actually doing the heavy lifting. Assumedly there is a difference between working under executive and management personnel and being staff TO executive and management personnel.
Though a real quick search did turn up a case where what the lawmakers intended by "management" was in question, so there is a distinct possibility they wrote their terms badly. It's weird reading a law that introduces terms like that without defining them.
- rhacker 5y agoSounds like bad law whether I say FOR or TO, both programmers and secretaries work for them. I am still professional staff to their whims. If they want me to dump medical records in this way or another way, I am required to do so towards their whims. I feel like the lawyers writing the law felt bad about saying: The people directly responsible for scheduling lunches and making sure executives have time to poop between calls. I think the reality of it is that secretaries are a form of excessiveness and they are afraid of losing that.