> We're happy to target anti-competitive behaviour from any operating system or browser if it relates to the open-web. Currently our main focus is user's browse

> We're happy to target anti-competitive behaviour from any operating system or browser if it relates to the open-web. Currently our main focus is user's browser choice It means you're not really focusing on the open web. You have a very specific, very narrow beef that you're pursuing. And it's parroting Chrome's propaganda basically word-for-word both on the website and here in the comments. > they have to be well understood and documented. If you're willing to type this up in detail... In Discord, right? You could start by actually looking around and figuring out these things yourself, too. Not just repeating Google's talking points. Good starting point: https://www.quirksmode.org/blog/archives/2021/08/breaking_the_we.html https://www.quirksmode.org/blog/archives/2021/08/breaking_th... Or maybe look at the status of the APIs you so ardently defend. Example, WebHID timeline: https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/459#issuecomment-886271967 https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/459#is... etc. > It's also really important to be specific as to why the behaviour is harmful to end consumers. We also need to order the issues in terms of priority and how damaging they are to the wider ecosystem. You've already stated your priorities loud and clear > and respecting a user's browser choice via Android or Google apps. Yup, it's s good one. Since Google doesn't respect that and ignores all/most input on the non-standards it's pushing out at neck-breaking speed, you can see where it's going if you "allow browser choice on iOS"