> I think it's pretty clear that you're not a good match for startups. It's pretty clear you have little knowledge of startups outside of those seeking unicorn

> I think it's pretty clear that you're not a good match for startups. It's pretty clear you have little knowledge of startups outside of those seeking unicorn trajectory. That's to your detriment. > You're just not a good match for a startup co-founder position. This is just an absolutely incredulous and naive take, and it shows some of the worst bubble mentality and arrogance that this industry has to offer. I've spent my career within startups, I've cofounded several you've probably never heard of that are still going and are still successful. But because they're not unicorns, never aspired to be one, and don't fit the mold of your specific view of what a startup is - well, clearly this person isn't fit. I'm not sure how anyone can take your opinions on the topic seriously after you've revealed yourself in this way. In a way, I pity that your view is so narrow. Again, to anyone reading this thread - it doesn't have to be the way they're describing it. Life and business are not confined to the stereotypes and tropes of Silicon Valley startup culture, and you don't have to subscribe to their tenets to be successful.