Yes of course. Turns out the CEO in question was engaged in deception and self-dealing and self-enrichment without consent of shareholders. Sounds like a good

Yes of course. Turns out the CEO in question was engaged in deception and self-dealing and self-enrichment without consent of shareholders. Sounds like a good reason to back out of a deal. Unlike the reason you originally stated which was excessive compensation. As I pointed out that’s not a good reason. Clearly there was more to the story.