This reads more like an unsourced, conspiratorial rant than an educated analysis of NATO expansion. He managed to hit: - Netflix won't host his movie that is a

This reads more like an unsourced, conspiratorial rant than an educated analysis of NATO expansion. He managed to hit: - Netflix won't host his movie that is a one-sided defence of his $700M fraud conviction, equates it to cancel culture - The Clintons are to blame - The Clintons wanted to "take over" Russia after the fall of the USSR - NATO isn't a defensive alliance because it "moves in aggressive ways" - The emergence of the LPR and DPR was totally just a self determined act and had nothing to do with a Russian invasion Repeating Putin talking points and engaging in whataboutism doesn't make for a meaningful analysis.