4 ms·
I'm not sure why wavephorm was downvoted. He rised valid point - on modern browsers a lot of functionality offered by jQuery could be easily achieved with pure
by jarek-foksa 15y ago
I'm not sure why wavephorm was downvoted. He rised valid point - on modern browsers a lot of functionality offered by jQuery could be easily achieved with pure DOM/CSS3/WebSockets.
In the upcoming years I expect jQuery to be replaced by more specialized and interoperable microframeworks like those listed on http://microjs.com/ http://microjs.com/
This discussion reminds me a bit http://www.doxdesk.com/img/updates/20091116-so-large.gif http://www.doxdesk.com/img/updates/20091116-so-large.gif
- jonknee 15y agoSure, but it's going to be a long time since we have all modern browsers. At the moment people want modern functionality, so tools like jQuery are invaluable. At the same time I think jQuery sees this divide as well, which is why Sizzle has been separated.