That isn’t really answering the question. The question is, is there inherently a massive trade off between our living standards and addressing climate, given t

That isn’t really answering the question. The question is, is there inherently a massive trade off between our living standards and addressing climate, given there is no substantial change in our level of technology (you said we’d need to go backwards 2 centuries). If we “magically” implemented political solutions with proper urgency, does that necessarily entail a massive drop in living standards in your mind?